Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Jessica Smith, Joel Wallskog, M.D., Theodore Cabaniss, on behalf of his minor son, T.C. and others
Defendant: United States of America, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Kennedy v. Biden
as 24-30252
Plaintiff: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Childrens Health Defense and Connie Sampognaro
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Natl Infusion Center v. Becerra
as 24-50180
Plaintiff: National Infusion Center Association, on behalf of itself and its members, Global Colon Cancer Association, on behalf of itself and its members and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, on behalf of itself and its members
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, In Her Official Capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Dierlam v. Biden
as 23-20401
Plaintiff / Appellant: John J. Dierlam
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
National Infusion Center Association et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff: National Infusion Center Association, Global Colon Cancer Association and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
John Dierlam v. Donald Trump, President, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-20440
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN J. DIERLAM
Defendant - Appellee: DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Francisco Aguero, Sr. v. Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-50814
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANCISCO J. AGUERO, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: CHASE BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Office of Inspector General and others
John Dierlam v. Donald Trump, President, et al
as 17-20165
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN J. DIERLAM
Defendant - Appellee: DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THOMAS PRICE, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Akrivis Laboratories, LLC v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv11656
Plaintiff: Akrivis Laboratories, LLC
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services and Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Green v. United States Department of Health & Human Services, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02827
Plaintiff: David Green
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services and Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?