Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 56
United Farm Workers, et al. v. The United States Department of Labor, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01690
Defendant: Eugene Scalia and The United States Department of Labor
Plaintiff: United Farm Workers and UFW Foundation
Amicus Curiae: State of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv07331
Plaintiff: University of Utah, Stanford University, Cornell University and others
Defendant: Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae: American Immigration Council, 46 Leading U.S. Companies, U.S. Tech Workers and others
Interested Party: Syed Nazim Ali and Colleges and Universities
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Department of Labor v. Corona Vineyard Management LLC et al
as 3:2020cv06378
Defendant: Corona Vineyard Management LLC and Anoroc Vineyard Management LLC
Plaintiff: Secretary of United States Department of Labor
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Amalgamated Transit Union International et al v. United States Department Of Labor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00953
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1575, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1277 and others
Defendant: Patrick Pizzella and United States Department of Labor
Intervenor: State Of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Center for Investigative Reporting v. United States Department of Labor We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05603
Plaintiff: The Center for Investigative Reporting and Will Evans
Defendant: Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2019cv01412
Defendant: Richard M. Clark, Administrative Law Judge, Bharath Raghukultilak, Loren Sweatt, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Health and Safety Administration and others
Plaintiff: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv06114
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund et al v. R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2018cv02177
Petitioner: Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund , Edward R. Lenhart, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Chuck Mack, individually and in his capacity as Co-Chairman/Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Respondent: R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Klaus Placke, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director, United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
State of California v. Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05783
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Delaware, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: Health and Human Services , Department of Labor , Secretary of United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hopkins v. United States Department of Labor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02761
Plaintiff: Jermaine A. Hopkins
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Thomas E Perez, David Weil and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?