Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Casteneda et al v. The United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 3:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Jesus Casteneda and Jose Villanueva
Defendant:
The United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedures Act
Central Money Exchange N.V. et al v. United States of America Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2020cv22608
Plaintiff:
Sharma Narsing and Central Money Exchange N.V.
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency and United States of America Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Woods v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2016cv01288
Plaintiff:
John B Woods
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Mohamed Kawam v. DEA
as 14-4241
Petitioner:
MOHAMED M. KAWAM, MD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
King, Sr. v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 8:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Windell R. King, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency and United States Postal Inspection Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Mathew v. DEA
as 10-73480
Petitioner:
GEORGE MATHEW, M.D.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
-RC Aguila v. The United States of America, et al.
as 8:2008cv01455
Plaintiff:
Miguel Lomeli Aguila and Maria G. Lomeli
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency Agents 1-10, Supervising Drug Enforcement Agency Agents 11-20, The United States Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Burrell et al v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 2:2009mc01034
Plaintiff:
Martin R. Burrell, Marcellus Hogan and Jeremiah David Walker
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY v. GARRISON
as 1:2008mc00594
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Respondent:
SHAVERY GARRISON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
