Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marlow v. United States Marshal Service
as 3:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel S Marlow
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brodie v. United States Marshall Service
as 3:2020cv00095
Respondent:
United States Marshall Service
Petitioner:
Robert E. Brodie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ibrihim v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent:
Jackson, A.W. Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burns v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Burns
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Malone v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Jimmy David Malone
Defendant:
John Sanchez and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bordages v. United States Justice Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Justice Dept., United States Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ganibe et al
as 2:2015cv02022
Defendant:
Gabriel J Ganibe, United States Marshals Service and United States
Plaintiff:
Tawana Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Davis v. United States Marshal Service
as 3:2013cv00399
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Annette Howser Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
