Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ROLLE v. PERRY et al
as 4:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
RANDALL ROLLE
Defendant:
CHARLES PERRY, SAM BRUCE, RANDY FRAZEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01081
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ford v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv01662
Petitioner:
Justin Ford
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley v. United States Marshals Service
as 9:2016cv80238
Plaintiff:
Terry Coley
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Randall Rolle v. United States Marshals Service
as 15-13615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
JAI DEVON LEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and BILLY HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grimes v. Rott et al
as 9:2015cv80972
Plaintiff:
Reginald Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Richard Rott, Five Unknown Named Agents of Federal Task Force, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility, The G.E.D. Group Inc., R. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
