Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Swint v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 2:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court, United States Marshals Service and Constitution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albretsen v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mara Albretsen
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Person v. Wilstin et al
as 3:2022cv05907
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person
Defendant:
Nichole E Wilstin, Daniel Patton, Summit Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wood
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Israel Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Meiklejohn et al
as 2:2019cv01755
Defendant:
Barbara H Meiklejohn, Todd, Harvey Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
Gerald M Auerback, Vincent T O'Neal, Hyunok Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown, Jr and Jerome Julius Brown, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdul-Latif v. Feather et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Petitioner:
Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif
Respondent:
Marion Feather , United States Marshal's Service Operation Supervisor and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phair v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
Maurice Phair
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Marshal's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franetich v. Spokane County Jail et al
as 2:2007cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jeriehmie J Franetich
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail, United States Marshals and Benton County Corrections Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
