Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Clervrain v. Wilson et al
as 2:2020cv02061
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Raquel Wilson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Does Other Agencies of United States of America; Doctor Krystal, Amanda Granger and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotner v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02012
Petitioner:
Robert Cotner
Respondent:
United States of America and Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Qumbargi v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv00137
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Haitham Qumbargi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv05189
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Whitt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv05157
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Whitt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenemore v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv05076
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Kenemore, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gamache v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv05078
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gamache
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snell v. Oglesby
as 4:2010cv04095
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Snell
Defendant:
Government of the United States of America, Western District of Arkansas, The, Bi-State/Bowie County Correctional Center, Community Education Centers Correctional and Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv06032
Petitioner:
Henry Tonje Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
