Cases 41 - 50 of 16,470
Dooley v. USA
as 2:2024cv10716
Petitioner:
Donte Dooley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv10717
Petitioner:
Raymond W. Adams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pointer v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
Kenneth Christopher Pointer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Sara Kane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Sara Kane, as Personal Representative and Sara Kane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
United States of America v. $7,967.67 from Michigan State University Federal Credit Union Account Ending 8960
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,967.67 from Michigan State University Federal Credit Union Account Ending 8960
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Peterson
as 2:2024mc50234
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Duane Peterson
Interested Party:
Denise Terry
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv10630
Petitioner:
Anthony James Patterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv10631
Petitioner:
Anthony James Patterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Green v. USA
as 2:2024cv10580
Petitioner:
Clifford Green
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
