Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Rowan v. Baptist Memorial Hospital - East et al
as 2:2015cv02461
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Baptist Memorial Hospital - East, Globe Life Insurance and Accident Co., Motel 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Garcilazo v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sheila Rose Garcilazo
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Kent Cunic
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp. v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv01923
Plaintiff:
Progressive Hawaii Insurance Corp.
Defendant:
Susan Smith and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. The United States Postal Service
as 2:2014cv02259
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Conley v. Webb et al
as 1:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Shelby B. Conley
Defendant:
Devonna L. Webb and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Palmer v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael Palmer
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Vickie Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gomez v. United States
as 2:2013cv02183
Petitioner:
Geovanny Gomez
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chumpia v. United States et al
as 2:2013cv02131
Plaintiff:
Bamrung P. Chumpia
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Michigan State U, Secretary of U.S. Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
