Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Fisher v. U.S. Treasury Dept
as 24-20166
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fisher
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department and Veterans Administration
John Demos, Jr., et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Society of T.R.U.T.H
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Washington, D.C., Donald J. Trump, President and others
Fisher v. The United States Treasury Department et al
as 4:2023cv02545
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fisher
Defendant:
The United States Treasury Department and The VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. United States Treasury
as 6:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
James E. Conner
Defendant:
United States Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadoree v. United States Treasury
as 6:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jordan Cadoree
Defendant:
United States Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. United States Treasury Secretary
as 1:2022cv06655
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bennett
Defendant:
United States Treasury Secretary, Office of Alien Property Custodian, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. U.S. Treasury
as 22-50760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Travell D. Harvey
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Treasury
Harvey v. United States Treasury
as 6:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Travell D Harvey
Defendant:
United States Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05464
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Robert M Jackson, Jay Robert Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05463
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Rob Jackson, Jay Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
