Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KONRATH v. UNITY HEALTHCARE LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00089
Defendant:
JOHN BAUMAN, JASON BURGETT, DAN DALUGA and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 FMLA: Leave Requirements
Konrath v. Unity Healthcare LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Unity Healthcare, LLC, Robert Hagen, Dan Dalga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konrath - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Unity Healthcare, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Unity Healthcare, LLC, Robert Hagen, Dan Daluga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KONRATH v. UNITY HEALTHCARE LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00012
Defendant:
JOHN BAUMAN, JASON BURGETT, DAN DALGA and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONRATH v. UNITY HEALTHCARE LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00011
Defendant:
JOHN BAUMAN, JASON BURGETT, DAN DALUGA and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konrath v. Konrath et al
as 1:2016cv10801
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Ana Loya Konrath and Unity Healthcare, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konrath v. Anesthesiologists of St Elizabeth Medical Center et al
as 3:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Anesthesiologists of St Elizabeth Medical Center, St Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center, Jennifer Struck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konrath v. Hagen et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Robert Hagen, Dan Daluga, John Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konrath v. Unity Healthcare
as 3:2016cv00492
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
Unity Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
