Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00567
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bowman v. Ouachita Parish et al
as 3:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
Aaron Larry Bowman
Defendant:
Jay Russell, City Police of Monroe, Louisiana State Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowman v. Sheriffs Office Ouachita Parish et al
as 3:2020cv01372
Defendant:
Monroe Police Department, University of Louisiana at Monroe Police Department, Deputy Donovan Ginn and others
Not Classified By Court:
Sheriff Jay Russell
Plaintiff:
Aaron Larry Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dung Pham v. Univ of LA at Monroe, et al
as 16-30920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUNG QUOC PHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
BENNY BLAYLOCK, in his official capacity as Dean of the College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana at Monroe, KEITH JACKSON, individually and in his official capacity as Faculty Chairperson of the Board of Ethics of the College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana at Monroe, TIBB JACOBS, individually and in her official capacity as the Faculty Chairperson of the Board of Ethics of the College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana at Monroe and others
Pham v. University of Louisiana at Monroe et al
as 3:2016cv00467
Plaintiff:
Dung Quoc Pham
Defendant:
University of Louisiana at Monroe , Benny Blaylock , Keith Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
