Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Gerald Fuller v. Bobby Shearin
as 15-6799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD DAVIS FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN, LIEUTENANT ROBERT MANUEL, SERGEANT RANDALL RASE and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville
as 14-7180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 14-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
