Cases 41 - 50 of 205
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. P. Graham
as 13-7410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
P. J. GRAHAM, RON SMITH, UNKNOWN FEMALE OFFICER and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 13-7411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 13-7409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, Joseph Gardner, William C. Toman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. C. Blake
as 13-7342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
C. C. BLAKE, JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2013cv00603
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, Joseph Gardner, William C. Toman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
