Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyd v. Saul
as 4:2019cv04525
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, US Attorney General and US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Texas
Plaintiff:
Courtney Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
McGowan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and US Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Annie M. McGowan
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ramirez v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv02504
Plaintiff:
Destiny Ramirez
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill, US Attorney's Office in Houston, TX and Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Warfield v. Colvin
as 4:2018cv02474
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, US Attorney General and US Attorney's Office in Houston, TX
Plaintiff:
Melinda A Warfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nichols v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv02278
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill, U.S. Attorney General and US Attorney's Office in Houston, TX
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Aguero v. Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. Aguero, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Christopher Banks, CCL #1, CCL #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Duru v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv03546
Plaintiff:
Duru and Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant:
Mitchell, Locke Lord LLP, Kaiser Permanente Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duru v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2016cv03724
Plaintiff:
Duru and Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant:
DOJ-Karen, MitchellCase transferred to Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
