Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ray v. US Bank NA et al
as 4:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray
Defendant:
ProCollect, Inc. and US Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Deanthony Thomas, et al v. US Bank NA ND, et al
as 14-2265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deanthony Thomas, Susan Jelinek-Thomas, Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND, FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust, 1996-2, FirstPlus Home Loan Owner Trust 1996-3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Bank National Association, Ace Securities Corp. Home Loan Trust 1999-A, Associates First Capital Corporation, doing business as The Associates and others
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. US Bank, NA
as 6:2013cv02041
Plaintiff:
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
US Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
TQP Development, LLC v. Directv, Inc, et al
as 1:2012mc00105
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Expedia, Inc, Orbitz, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Modi v. Wasendorf et al
as 6:2012cv02057
Plaintiff:
Gobind Modi
Defendant:
Russell Wasendorf, Sr, Russell Wasendorf, Jr, Niel J Aslin and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Thomas et al v. US Bank NA ND et al
as 5:2011cv06013
Plaintiff:
Deanthony Thomas , Susan Jelinek-Thomas , Steven M. Rich and others
Defendant:
US Bank NA ND , US Bank , Ace Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
