Cases 41 - 50 of 1,108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cuixiao Zhang v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Cuixiao Zhang
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jieri Leng v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jieri Leng
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carr et al v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv02875
Plaintiff:
Brian P Carr, Rueangrong Carr and Buakhao Von Kramer
Defendant:
United States, US Department of Justice, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
