Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gary Kendall v. USA, et al
as 20-35433
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD A. STONE, Dr., Under Secretary for Health, Executive in Charge, US Department of Veterans Affairs, RORY S. O'CONNOR, Physicians Assistant, VA Med Cntr Boise, ID, ROBERT WILKE, Secretary of the US Dept of Veterans Affair and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY OWEN KENDALL
Active Thermal Concepts, Inc. v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Active Thermal Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Rosario-Gonzalez v. US Dept of Veterans Affair
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ
Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Rosario-Gonzalez v. US Dept of Veterans Affair
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ
Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Bajorek v. Veterans Affairs
as 2:2015cv14313
Plaintiff:
David A. Bajorek
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Suren-Millan v. US, et al
as 14-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SUREN-MILLAN
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Lehet v. US Dept of Veteran Affairs
as 8:2014cv01937
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas Lehet
Defendant:
US Dept of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 7462
Soto v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 13-2120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARITZA P. SOTO
Defendant - Appellee:
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION and US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv01645
Plaintiff:
George A. Miller
Defendant:
United States of America, US Dept. of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reaves v. US Dept of Veterans Affair
as 12-1785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
