Cases 1 - 10 of 28
(PS) Sweeting v. FBI, et al
as 2:2023cv02807
Plaintiff:
Sierra M. Sweeting
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, State of California and US Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Melton v. Stockton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Anthony Russell Melton
Defendant:
Stockton Police Department, San Joaquin County Sheriff and US Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Schembri v. FBI Headquarters et al
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kimberley A. Schembri
Defendant:
FBI Headquarters, US Marshals Headquarters, DEA Drug Enforcement Administrative and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lourdes Sandoval v. City Of Anaheim et al
as 8:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Sandoval
Defendant:
City Of Anaheim, US Marshall, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Gaxiola v. US Marshal's
as 3:2020cv00279
Petitioner:
Hector Manuel Gaxiola
Respondent:
US Marshal's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leyva v. US Marshal et al
as 3:2019cv00257
Defendant:
ICE HSI and US Marshal
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Banda Leyva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Moody v. US Marshal
as 4:2018cv00788
Plaintiff:
Lisa LM Moody
Defendant:
US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DASTMALCHIAN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2015cv09072
Plaintiff:
Shabnam Dastmalchian
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Does 1-10, ANTHONY MOSELEY and others
Mehmood v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., NSDC et al
as 1:2015cv01468
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Respondent:
Trinity Services Group, Inc., NSDC , US Marshals Service , CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mehmood v. US Marshal Service et al
as 2:2013cv02408
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Jail Commander, Classification Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
