Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Criscione v. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
as 8:2019cv02087
Defendant:
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Criscione
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 5851
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Nuclear Regulatory Commissi
as 12-1772
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Respondent:
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Movant:
PILGRIM WATCH, Mary E. Lampert, Director, DUXBURY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Kevin M. Nord, Fire Chief & Director and PLYMOUTH, MA, Melissa Arrighi, Acting Town Manager
Beyond Nuclear, et al v. US Nuclear Regulatory Commissi
as 12-1561
Petitioner:
BEYOND NUCLEAR, Paul Gunter, Director of Reactor Oversight Project, NEW HAMPSHIRE SIERRA CLUB, Kurt Ehrenberg, Field Organizer and SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE, Doug Bogen, Executive Director
Respondent:
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Nuclear Regulatory Commissi
as 12-1404
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Respondent:
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Movant:
PILGRIM WATCH, Mary E. Lampert, Director, ENTERGY NUCLEAR INC. and DUXBURY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Kevin M. Nord, Fire Chief & Director
State of New Jersey v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al
as 11-3228
Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Respondent:
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Nuclear Regulatory Commissi, et al
as 08-2267
Petitioner:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Respondent:
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and UNITED STATES
:
, , and others
Commonwealth of MA, et al v. US Nuclear
as 07-1482
Petitioner:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
:
, , and others
Commonwealth of MA, et al v. US Nuclear
as 07-1483
Petitioner:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
