Cases 1 - 10 of 1,671
Rainbow USA, Inc. v. PM Crimson, LLC
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Rainbow USA, Inc.
Defendant:
PM Crimson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Overspray USA LLC et al v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Overspray USA LLC and April Janes Ramsey
Not Yet Classified:
April Ramsey
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and ACE American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shields v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shields
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robertson v. Hydromax USA et al
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Fatuma Robertson
Defendant:
Hydromax USA and Tommy Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
