Cases 11 - 20 of 21
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TAXIMETER, LLC
as 2:2016cv04102
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
TAXIMETER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan Fain v. USA Technologies Inc, et al
as 16-2436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN FAIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
USA TECHNOLOGIES INC, STEPHEN P. HERBERT, DAVID F. DEMEDIO and others
MESSNER v. USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05427
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. MESSNER
Defendant:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., STEPHEN P. HERBERT, DAVID F. DEMEDIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. v. USA Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02571
Plaintiff:
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
USA Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA Technologies, Inc. v. Matrix Service
as 4:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
USA Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Inc. Matrix Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TIRPAK et al
as 2:2012cv02399
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRADLEY M. TIRPAK , CRAIG W. THOMAS , JOHN S. IOANNOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TIRPAK et al
as 2:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRADLEY M. TIRPAK, CRAIG W. THOMAS and PETER A. MICHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIRPAK et al v. USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05920
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY M. TIRPAK and CRAIG W. THOMAS
Defendant:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEORGE R. JENSEN, JR., STEPHEN P. HERBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA Technologies, Inc. v. Doe
as 3:2009mc80275
Plaintiff:
USA Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and John Doe
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. DOE et al
as 2:2009cv00661
Plaintiff:
USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
