Cases 91 - 100 of 588
ROGERS v. WARDEN OF USP CANAAN
as 2:2022cv02178
Petitioner:
DAVID ROGERS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stroud v. USP-Lewisburg et al
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stroud
Defendant:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
William Evans v. Warden Victorville USP, et al
as 22-1144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN VICTORVILLE USP, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Cross v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Alito Tijwan Cross and Pamela Cross
Defendant:
USP-Allenwood Penitentiary and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Silmi v. Warden of USP-Lewisburg
as 1:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Emad Silmi
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2021cv20721
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, SOLOMON D NIKIRA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jeffrey Holland v. Warden Canaan USP
as 21-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY HOLLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
Shaw, Jr. v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2021cv02044
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Director Carvajal, E. Bradley, Health Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talli McFadden v. Warden Allenwood USP
as 21-3245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
