Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
ELLERBE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2012cv06605
Plaintiff: DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, FBI HEADQUARTERS, POSTMASTER GENERAL (USPS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MONCRIEF v. USPS et al
as 2:2012cv04804
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH MARY MONCRIEF
Defendant: USPS, GARY BELL and MICHAEL DERRECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JORDAN v. BLEDSOE et al
as 2:2011cv03091
Petitioner: MARK JORDAN
Respondent: B.A. BLEDSOE , USP-LEWISBURG and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKOFF v. DRS AT FDC PHILLY PA et al
as 2:2010cv04114
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BANKOFF
Defendant: DRS AT FDC PHILLY PA, DR AT USP CANAAN and DR. AT USP ALLENWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITTINGHAM v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2010cv01204
Plaintiff: DENISE BRITTINGHAM
Defendant: ETHICON WILLIAMSON RUSSELL, WATSON BRITTINGHAM, SOCIAL SECURITIES BENEFITS ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
BENABE v. OKKS DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2009cv03063
Plaintiff: JOSEFINA BENABE
Defendant: OKKS DEVELOPMENT, USPS LAW DEPARTMENT, USPS LAW DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Other Statutes None
GREER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (US) et al
as 2:2008cv06030
Plaintiff: CATHERINE E. GREER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (US), UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS) and UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Torts - Injury None
RAZZOLI v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2007cv02968
Plaintiff: KEVIN RAZZOLI
Defendant: HARLEY LAPPIN, Us Parole Commission, DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?