Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden, USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Warden, USP Marion
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Ricardo Guzman
Respondent:
Warden, USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilson v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Torres v. USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Defendant:
USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owens v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2023cv00474
Petitioner:
Lesley Tyra Owens
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barrientes v. Warden USP Pollock
as 23-30896
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jesus Rodrigues Barrientes, also known as Jesus Rodriguez Barrientes
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden USP Pollock
Delgado v. Warden at USP Yazoo City MA
as 3:2023cv03106
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Sanchez Delgado
Defendant:
Warden at USP Yazoo City MA
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hart v. Daniels
as 23-40639
Petitioner / Appellant:
Earl Francis Hart
Respondent / Appellee:
Charles Daniels, Warden, USP Beaumont
Johnson v. USP Beaumont et al
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Andre'a D Johnson
Defendant:
USP Beaumont, USP Beaumont Medical Dept, I Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
