Cases 21 - 30 of 132
McNatt v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50277
Petitioner:
Christopher McNatt
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson and Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael Gorbey v. Captain Avery, et al
as 22-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN AVERY, COUNSELOR GRAHAM, WARDEN, USP THOMSON and others
KEY et al v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
DAJUAN KEY and ERNEST RUSSEL
Defendant:
USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bearden v. Warden of Marion USP
as 3:2022cv01612
Petitioner:
Christopher Bearden
Respondent:
Warden of Marion USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farrington v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50250
Petitioner:
Tavares L. Farrington
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Jasper Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, FBOP - USP Thomson and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baldwin v. Administrative USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50235
Petitioner:
Reginald Baldwin
Respondent:
Administrative USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEVEN KALLIS, WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50163
Petitioner:
Michael Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
