Cases 11 - 20 of 411
Zaragosa-Solis v. Gutierrez, et al.
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M GUTIERREZ, complex warden, Unknown UNKNOWN CHRISTENSEN, PREA Lt., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, federal agency and others
In re: Dorian Sykes
as 23-12613
Petitioner:
In re: DORIAN TREVOR SYKES
Respondent:
USP COLEMAN II WARDEN
Jones v. United States of America, et al.
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD JOSEPH JONES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as United States, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, named as United States Dept. of Justice, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cofield et al v. Passport Motors Holding Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv01795
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keenan Cofield, Laverne Thompson, Kayla Nedd and others
Defendant:
X Corp, as successor in interest to named Defendant Twitter, Inc., PASSPORT MOTORS HOLDINGS, INC., U.S. Attorneys Office and others
Trustee:
Patricia B Jefferson and Hon. Patricia B. Jerfferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sean RobinsonIn re: Sean Robinson
as 23-2056
Petitioner:
In re: SEAN ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and JENNIFER P. WILSON
Jimmy Lee Eisenhour v. USDC-AZT
as 23-70078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JIMMY LEE ANTHONY EISENHOUR, M GUTIERREZ, Complez Warden, USP Tucson, AZ, J PADDEN, Dentist, USP Tucson, AZ and others
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE ANTHONY EISENHOUR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Marshall WilliamsIn re: Marshall Williams
as 23-11239
Petitioner:
In re: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Powell v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Shawanna Powell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, USPS, USPS Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Robin KnutsonIn re: Robin Knutson
as 23-10708
Petitioner:
In re: ROBIN KNUTSON
Respondent:
USP COLEMAN II WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
