Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01678
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Warden USP Allenwood, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hines et al v. Stamford Courthouse et al
as 3:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shemeka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Stamford Courthouse, Healthcare Reform Act, Healthcare Policies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heffley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv10033
Plaintiff:
Travis Heffley
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Psychology Department - USP Marion, Psychology Department - FTC Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 13-2069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Jordan
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc. and others
Ozsusamlar v. Warden, USP Florence High
as 1:2011cv04035
Plaintiff:
Osman N. Ozsusamlar
Defendant:
Warden, USP Florence High
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Twitty v. Ashcroft
as 11-448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, H. Lappin, Dir, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ind, G.L. Herschberger, Regional Dir, BOP, Ind and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons and Salius, CT Dept of Corr, Ind
Tellier v. USP Canaan Warden
as 1:2010cv09079
Petitioner:
Robin Tellier
Respondent:
USP Canaan Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Iglesias v. Federal Bureau of Prisons - USP Atlanta et al
as 2:2010cv03951
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons - USP Atlanta and Warden Keller
Plaintiff:
Erick Guillermo Valle Iglesias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Manns v. Warden USP Allenwood et al
as 3:2008cv00752
Petitioner:
Marc Anthony Manns
Respondent:
Warden USP Allenwood and Danbury District Attorney
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
