Cases 41 - 50 of 4,596
Steven Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co Inc, et al
as 15-2851
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN PAPP, individually and as Executor and Executor as Prosequendum of the Estate of MARY SUE PAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
FORE-KAST SALES CO INC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, FKA Allied Signal Inc, as successor-in-interest to teh Bendix Corporation, NEW BRUNSWICK PLATING CO, FKA New Brunswick Nickel and Chrome Plating and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BOEING CO, individually and as successor by merger to the McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Messier v. Ingersoll-Rand Co et al
as 3:2015cv00408
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Co, 3M Company, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
George Messier
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , IMO Indus Inc , Sepco and others
Cross_defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesteron Company , Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Unterberg et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10025
Plaintiff:
Kelan Unterberg
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
Cross_defendant:
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation , ABB, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sales v. Certain-Teed Corp et al
as 3:2014cv01542
Plaintiff:
Frank Sales
Defendant:
Certain-Teed Corp , Honeywell Intl Inc and Union Carbide Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maclachlan et al v. 3M et al
as 1:2014cv10001
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc., General Refractories Company, (1 - 100) John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Pat Maclachlan
Cross Claimant:
Oakfabco, Inc. and George V. Hamilton, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Donald Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Storer et al v. Crown Cork & Seal et al
as 5:2014cv02488
Plaintiff:
Martha Denmon Storer , Craig Storer , Mark Storer and others
Defendant:
Crown Cork & Seal Co Inc , Cleaver-Brooks Inc , Crane Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Storer et al v. Crown Cork & Seal Co Inc et al
as 5:2014cv02478
Plaintiff:
Martha D Storer, Craig Storer, Mark Storer and others
Defendant:
Crown Cork & Seal Co Inc, Cleaver-Brooks Inc, Crane Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROBINSON, et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv00161
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. ROBINSON , GAIL A. ROBINSON and William Robinson
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Allied Chemical Corporation , A.O. SMITH CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
CBS Corporation , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO. , GEORGIA- PACIFIC LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
GAIL A. ROBINSON , WILLIAM J. ROBINSON , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
