Cases 1 - 10 of 21
UNISYS CORPORATION v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2023cv00555
Counter Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION
Counter Claimant:
LEON GILBERT
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCGARVEY, ATOS SE and ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, INC.
STROUGO v. UNISYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04529
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STROUGO
Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION, PETER A. ALTABEF and DEBRA WINKLER MCCANN
BRUNSWICK v. UNISYS CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv02906
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRUNSWICK
Defendant:
UNISYS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
UNISYS CORPORATION v. NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv03829
Defendant:
NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
UNISYS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCEARCE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv06676
Plaintiff:
RONALD S. SCEARCE and ALISA J. SCEARCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ALPHA WIRE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Molina Information Systems LLC v. Unisys Corporation
as 1:2012cv01022
Plaintiff:
Molina Information Systems LLC
Defendant:
Unisys Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
JOHNSON v. MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv06913
Plaintiff:
ERIC B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. , UNISYS CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOTTSCHALL et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv60035
Plaintiff:
KIMBRA GOTTSCHALL , DEBRA GABALL , RAYMOND GOTTSCHALL and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC. , VIAD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
