Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv30124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv30077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Savage v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10771
Plaintiff:
Gary Savage
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and David Ortone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Ortiz v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01410
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victor Ortiz
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MAILLE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 2:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAILLE
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M & J COMMUNICATIONS INC v. AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
M & J COMMUNICATIONS INC
Defendant:
AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION, ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bolduc v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv12055
Plaintiff:
David Bolduc
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Teamsters Local 25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
KRAFT CHEMICAL COMPANY v. AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
KRAFT CHEMICAL COMPANY
Defendant:
AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION, ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
CASCO BAY IMPORTS INC v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
CASCO BAY IMPORTS INC
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, AVERITT EXPRESS, CON WAY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
