Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ragan v. Rivera et al
as 3:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Ragan
Defendant:
Jaime J. Rivera, TForce Freight, Inc., UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Kwiatkowski v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kwiatkowski
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Hughes et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Marion E. Hughes, Raymond S. Batts, James A. Crume and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shoopman et al v. VOD Transport, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00001
Executor:
Justin Michael Shoopman and Sandra Partin
Plaintiff:
S.P. and N.P.
Defendant:
VOD Transport, LLC, United Parcel Service, Inc., Syfan Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bonner v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00911
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Bonner
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., National Diagnostics, Inc. and Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 480
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ivan Burley v. Magan Dixon, et al
as 21-6008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN BURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGAN DIXON and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
