Cases 41 - 50 of 6,082
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Bryan Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Burns v. USA
as 4:2024cv00333
Petitioner:
Michael W. Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wolfe v. USA
as 1:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Bryan Shane Wolfe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Collum v. USA
as 5:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Terry M. Collum
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sheridan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Brandon L. Sheridan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wenig v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jay Allan Wenig
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Luster v. USA
as 5:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Vernon M. Luster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Windham v. USA
as 5:2024cv00320
Petitioner:
Seth Windham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. $9,930.00 in U.S. Currency, et al.
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,930.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Rosa Ceja, Adriana Jones and Howard Miller
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Schick v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Wayne Schick, FBI, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Schick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
