Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 165
City of Fernley v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00119
Plaintiff: City of Fernley
Defendant: Commissioner United States Bureau of Reclamation and Ernest A. Conant
Intervenor Plaintiff: David F Stix, Jr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AQUALLIANCE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00632
Plaintiff: AQUALLIANCE
Defendant: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Save The Colorado, et al v. United States, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, SAVE THE POUDRE: POUDRE WATERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MUNICIPAL SUBDISTRICT, NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD COLORADO and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01814
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Petitioner: Non-Party Westlands Water District, Non-Party Panoche Water District and Non-Party San Luis Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Shasta View Irrigation Distric, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 20-36020
Plaintiff / Appellant: TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, BRENDA BURMAN, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Klamath Irrigation District, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
as 20-36009
Plaintiff: VAN BRIMMER DITCH COMPANY, SHASTA VIEW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, JEFFREY NETTLETON, in his official capacity as Area Manager for the Klamath Area Reclamation Office and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 3:2020cv05630
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Not Classified By Court: Non-Party San Luis Water District, Non-Party Westlands Water District and Non-Party Panoche Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Stemen v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 4:2020cv03904
Defendant: United States of America, Robert Todd Eggert, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Jacob Thomas Stemen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00706
Plaintiff: Planning and Conservation League, Center for Biological Diversity and Restore The Delta
Defendant: David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
AquAlliance et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00959
Plaintiff: South Delta Water Agency, California Water Impact Network, Central Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?