Cases 1 - 6 of 6
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY & IMMIGRATION ADN CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 2:2019cv18666
Defendant:
XYZ CORP 1-10, JOHN 1 - 10 DOES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY & IMMIGRATION ADN CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
MS. TARAH N DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02167
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BEY v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2010cv00046
Petitioner:
NAZEER M. BEY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, GALINDO, MONMOUTH COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAOYE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2009cv01990
Plaintiff:
AMANDA C. LAOYE and AKINTOYE O. LAOYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patel v. Donate et al
as 3:2007cv01001
Petitioner:
Dasharathbhai C. Patel
Respondent:
Janine Donate, Thomas R. Decker and United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
CORDEIRO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2007cv01023
Petitioner:
RODNEY CORDEIRO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY & IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and GEORGE O'ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
