Cases 1 - 6 of 6
DIAB v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv10191
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD DIAB
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Acting Secretary of Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
F.M. et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv11247
Plaintiff:
F.M. and H.R.B.
Defendant:
Director, USCIS Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11311
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence, Chad F. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11283
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Amicus Curiae:
LinkedIn Corp., Dropbox, Inc., The Catholic University of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
RR STONE PRODUCTS LLC v. CUCCINELLI et al
as 1:2020cv10913
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II and others
Plaintiff:
RR STONE PRODUCTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Chemgenes Corporation v. Richardson et al
as 1:2019cv12343
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, USCIS, Director Gregory A. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Chemgenes Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
