Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bryant et al v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, City of Norfolk, United States Department of Housing & Urban Development and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sprately, Conswayla Simmons, Evonne Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
DRAPER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 6:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Lynchburg Circuit Court, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and LYNCHBURG GENERAL DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Euron Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ronnie Dyson v. Brian Liggan
as 12-1101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONNIE DYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN LIGGAN, Virginia Capital Realty Property Manager of 1514 Perry Street, Richmond, VA 23224, DAVID LIGGAN, Virginia Capital Realty Property Manager of 1514 Perry Street, Richmond, VA 23224, VIRGINIA CAPITAL REALTY, Fannie Mae (Owner) and others
Georgia Gilchrist v. Raman Bakshi
as 10-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGIA L. GILCHRIST
Plaintiff:
MARIKA G. MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMAN BAKSHI and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Roy Sudduth v. Brenda Vasquez
as 09-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY SUDDUTH
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA VASQUEZ, CARMEN BONILLA, ROBERT C. KETTLER and others
Shirley Rogers v. HUD
as 08-1079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY ROGERS and TRACY ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
