Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Bell Foundry Co et al
as 2:2016cv07389
Defendant:
Bell Foundry Co and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Interested Party:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. NC Dept of Environment
as 15-2003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES, JOHN E. SKVARLA, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and TOM REEDER, Director, Division of Water Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
PAMLICO-TAR RIVER FOUNDATION, FRIENDS OF POCOSIN LAKES NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INCORPORATED
United States v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 3:2014cv00089
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1251
United States Department of Justice et al v. Teck American, Incorporated et al.
as 1:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice and State of Missouri
Defendant:
Teck American Incorporated and DII Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United States Department of Justice et al v. Teck American, Incorporated et al.
as 4:2013cv02548
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice and State of Missouri
Defendant:
Teck American Incorporated and DII Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Huntress et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2012cv01146
Plaintiff:
William L. Huntress , Acquest Development, LLC and Acquest Transit, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , William J. Hochul, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-17144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Defendant:
LESTER A. SNOW
Intervenor-Defendant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-17143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
Family Farm Alliance, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-16679
Plaintiff:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
State Water Contractors v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-16660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE WATER CONTRACTORS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROWAN GOULD, as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
