Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HomeTown Bank v. United States Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service et al
as 0:2023cv02516
Plaintiff:
HomeTown Bank
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service, Nathan Staples Estate, Nathan Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Oates v. Benton County Jail et al
as 0:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Lovell Nahmour Oates
Defendant:
Benton County Jail, Minnesota Department of Corrections and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hortman et al
as 0:2019cv01304
Defendant:
Melissa Hartman, United States & M.N Congress, United States Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff:
Howard G Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings Chrysler Center, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 0:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Hastings Chrysler Center, Inc. , Douglas W. Erickson and Hastings Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Weise v. Mallak et al
as 0:2013cv02654
Plaintiff:
Sherry M. Weise
Defendant:
Arthur T. Mallak, Ann D. Mallak, United States Department of Treasury and others
Daniel Medford et al Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 0:2013cv01726
Plaintiff:
The QC Group Inc. , Daniel Medford and David DeVowe
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Seth D. Harris , Jacob Lew and others
Wattleton v. United States Department of Treasury et al
as 0:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury, Federal Medical Center Trust Fund Administrator and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anchor Bank, N.A. v. Stych Communications, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00593
Plaintiff:
Anchor Bank, N.A. and Anchor Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Stych Communications, Inc., Edward J. Stych, III, Anne L. Stych and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
