Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Wolff v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 21-1266
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES JAY WOLFF
DUFRESNE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2021cv10538
Plaintiff:
GERALD DUFRESNE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, West Roxbury VA Hospital and US Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Janas v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 21-1240
Defendant / Appellee:
WINGATE OF SPRINGFIELD, BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., MASSHEALTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDMUND J. JANAS, III and EDMUND J. JANAS, II
Almodovar v. McDonough
as 21-1061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALMODOVAR
Defendant / Appellee:
DAT TRAN, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Nieves v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affair
as 20-1045
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES (DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS)
Not Classified By Court:
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMAYRA NIEVES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00523
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dionne v. Shulkin et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Defendant:
Ann Brown, Christine Pons, David Shulkin and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Dionne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DiGiacomo v. Shulkin et al
as 1:2017cv10324
Plaintiff:
Henry J. DiGiacomo
Defendant:
David Shulkin and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
