Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03920
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOMAN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al
as 2:2011cv03709
Petitioner:
DONALD HOMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03114
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
FISHER v. CUE et al
as 2:2011cv02545
Petitioner:
OMAR FISHER
Respondent:
CUE, LEGROME D. DAVIS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COMBER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv02039
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. COMBER, III
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HAVERTOWN POLICE DEPT., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABBOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC JOSEPH ABBOTT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GRATERFORD, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRADER v. S. et al
as 2:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Defendant:
R. S., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, OFFICE OF THE CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al
as 2:2010cv07564
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRADLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and SANDY L.U. BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMBER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv07238
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. COMBER, III
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT OF APPEALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yanez-Garcia v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2010cv01430
Petitioner:
Martin Yanez-Garcia
Respondent:
David Ebbert and AUSA United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
