Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RUIZ-ACOSTA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT DIX
as 1:2017cv03675
Plaintiff:
SANTOS RUIZ-ACOSTA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02924
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MAGGIE F. MOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEEFE v. KEEFE et al
as 3:2017cv01334
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID KEEFE
Defendant:
SHARON KEEFE, THEODORE LABRECQUE, JAMES KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPONT v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv07846
Plaintiff:
VERCY DUPONT, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv02242
Petitioner:
STEPHEN THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FARMER v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2015cv06703
Petitioner:
LEROY S FARMER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOLAKOWSKI v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv01583
Plaintiff:
DAVID KOLAKOWSKI
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE , GLENN GRANT , STEPHEN M. SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
