Cases 1 - 10 of 189
BURNS v. GOOLDIN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE KAIN BURNS and KEVIN LEE
Defendant:
CHERYL GOOLDIN, JOHN GOOLDIN, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchison v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert C. Hutchison
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Honeywell Electronics, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Longo v. United States Government et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Longo
Defendant:
United States Government and Matthew M. Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Lovelace v. The United States Government
as 1:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Lovelace, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amar Gueye v. Android, et al
as 23-11324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMAR GUEYE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDROID, T-MOBILE USA, INC., AT&T and others
Gueye v. Android et al
as 9:2023cv80463
Plaintiff:
Amar Gueye
Defendant:
Android, T-Mobile, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Erdek v. United States Government
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Paul Erdek
Defendant:
United States Government
Gary v. United States Government et al
as 1:2022cv05149
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Gary
Defendant:
United States Government, President Joe Biden, National Security Agency/Central Security Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ian Simpson v. United States Government
as 22-13480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAN MURRAY SIMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
JAMES v UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 3:2022cv18025
Plaintiff:
WAYNE AG JAMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
