Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dean Himbler Aviles v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2019cv01723
Respondent:
John T. Lemaster, Jackie Lacey, United States Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yam v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
April Sanchez, United States Marshals Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Yanchhi Yam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Clarence A Branch III v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv01973
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Branch, III
Defendant:
Director of Commerce, William Jones, Mike Riggs and others
Camillo-Amisano v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2017cv06634
Petitioner:
Phillip Camillo-Amisano
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Steve Langford and United States Marshals Service
John May v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv05177
Defendant:
Does, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
John May
Stepanyan v. County of Alameda, et al
as 3:2017cv03839
Plaintiff:
Artur Stepanyan
Defendant:
County of Alameda, United States Marshals Service and Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. United States Marshals Service Agents et al
as 3:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kyle James
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service Agents, K. Laney, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Beatriz Paez et al v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2016cv03070
Defendant:
Anthony Burke, County of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Paez
Yan Sui v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 8:2016cv00223
Defendant:
Jess R. Bressi, John Chance, Dentons U.S. LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Yan Sui
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
