Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Campbell v. Vazquez et al
as 2:2024cv10394
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Campbell
Defendant:
Clinton Vazquez, Logan Township Police Department and United States Marshal Service
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv12387
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collier v. Bowling et al
as 2:2023cv11675
Plaintiff:
Jammie Collier
Defendant:
Dan Bowling, Nathan Satura, Kenneth Monroe and others
United States of America v. Currency $67,344.93 remitted to the United States Marshals Service from Chase Account ending in 0852 et al
as 2:2023cv11368
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency $67,344.93 remitted to the United States Marshals Service from Chase Account ending in 0852, Currency $54,499.93 remitted to the United States Marshals Service from Chase Account ending in 7885, Currency $102,000.00 remitted to the United States Marshals Service from Chase Account ending in 0811 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Walton v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
as 2:2023cv10169
Plaintiff:
Charles Walton
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, United States Marshal Service, Jonathan Hemingway and others
Cain v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv12483
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Pilot v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv11097
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Pilot
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson, Charles G Goedert, Hazel Park, City of and others
Sapp v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv13691
Plaintiff:
Lamount M. Sapp
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Hills v. United States Marshal Service
as 4:2016cv11798
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Hills
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
