Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bradley James Much v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv09292
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, AT and T, Actors, Actresses and Media Personalities and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The United States Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
Betty Sims
Defendant:
The United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2016cv06837
Movant:
christian Johnson and United States Social Security Administration
Rico v. United States Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00469
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Rico
Respondent:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rico v. United States Social Security Administration
as 1:2015at00240
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Rico
Respondent:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Alfredo Ramirez v. Jo Anne Barnhart et al
as 2:2014cv02806
Defendant:
Jo Anne Barnhart and United States Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez
Shack v. United States Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv00539
Plaintiff:
James D. Shack
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wright v. United States Interagency Council on Homelessness et al
as 4:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
Franklin H. Wright
Defendant:
United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, United States Social Security Administration, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
