Cases 81 - 90 of 71,654
USA v. Botello Vargas
as 24-50362
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Evette Cesilia Botello Vargas
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00434
Petitioner:
Christopher T King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Pigues
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kewana Pigues
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Boyce
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fernandez Boyce
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Carrera-Chavez v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Pedro Carrera-Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Isom
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Isom
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Canoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Connie Canoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Gwendolyn Durr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v. Kadala et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ryan Kadala and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v. United State of America
as 4:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
