Cases 1 - 10 of 475
Bran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Bran
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wilson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shawn P. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muschetta v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Demetrius Muschetta
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lamm v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Lamm
Defendant:
United States of America, Mr. McCrae, Ms. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. United States Of America
as 3:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stapleton v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Defendant:
United States of America, K.M. Anderson, Paul Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00613
Petitioner:
Jermaine Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
