Cases 1 - 10 of 71,649
Sollberger v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
John Sollberger
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Kendrick v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01292
Plaintiff:
Stevan Kendrick
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0742 Suits in Admiralty Act
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. Randall Molnar
Defendant:
Cadence McShane Construction Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
United States of America v. Turner
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shirley Turner
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Sanders
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Javarius Sanders
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Faulkner
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gabrielle Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Terry v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Terry
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. Barrera
as 4:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Barrera
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
United States of America v. Baeza
as 4:2024cv01851
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Karla Baeza
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
