Civil Rights Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06029
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huang, MD v. Dooley, MD et al
as 1:2018cv00519
Plaintiff: Shuyan Huang, MD
Defendant: Joseph Dooley, MD, David Kaufman, MD, Kari Schenck, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eli Smith v. University of Rochester Medical Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv06781
Plaintiff: Cori Louis Eli Smith
Defendant: University of Rochester Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv06107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Leon Michael Kornegay v. New York State Office of Menta
as 10-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant: Leon Michael T. Kornegay
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Office of Mental Health, Supervisory Personnel, New York State Office of Mental Health, Susan Shilling, Director of AOT, New York State Office of Mental Health and others
Kornegay v. New York State Office of Mental Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04066
Plaintiff: Leon Michael T. Kornegay
Defendant: New York State Office of Mental Health, Any Supervisory Personnel New York State Office of Mental Health, Susan Shilling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coley-Allen v. Strong Health, University of Rochester Medical Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv06036
Plaintiff: Antoinette Coley-Allen
Defendant: Strong Health, University of Rochester Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?